May 22, 2005
"5. Reader Steven L. Carter of Bala Cynwyd, Pa., asks, If "Tucker Carlson is identified as a conservative" in The Times, then why is "Bill Moyers just, well, plain old Bill Moyers"? Good question."
You tell 'em, Steve. "Bala Cynwyd" is proud of you.
Okrent's job goes to a guy named Barney who just retired from the Wall Street Journal's news desk recently. That shouldn't necessarily get anyone's hopes up that he's somehow ideologically conservative; after all, the WSJ editorial page's liberal columnist Al Hunt was recruited from the news side of their operation. Anyway, ideology shouldn't really matter for this job, although I hope he will be receptive to conservative criticism of the Times' relentless cheerleading for libertinism, socialism, and cosmopolitan internationalism.
Don't know what to say about Okrent's legacy. I don't see where he forced any major reform at the paper, but there's not too much any single person could have done. One of the things he regrets, according to his final column, is admitting that "of course" the Times is a liberal paper. Well, I thought that was a welcome burst of candor, though Okrent rues handing ideological critics of the Times that particular club.
But you're supposed to tell the truth, and let the chips fall where they may. If people criticize the paper, at least it will be for being honest and liberal instead of being liberal and lying about it.
Posted by: seedubya at
04:08 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 291 words, total size 2 kb.
Plus, she apparently has a new beau she met through her blog. Career advancement, friends, romance--is there anything blogs can't do? (Whoa, I'm sounding like Hugh Hewitt.)
Posted by: seedubya at
03:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
May 21, 2005
This isn't a partisan article. Which is good because Oil-of-Uday shouldn't be a partisan issue.
I will point this out just to exercise the moonbats who flutter by here now and then: if you honestly think there is some unsavory link persisting between Dick Cheney and Halliburton, how can you fail to be outraged at the much grander, and more brazen, corruption between Saddam and the UN--criminal activity that snatched relief from starving Iraqis, that supported terrorist groups, that bribed world leaders, and that subverted and made a mockery of the very international institutions you hold so dear?
Posted by: seedubya at
11:39 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Traderrob at
07:14 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 0 words, total size 1 kb.
Austin Bernard III, 36, was charged with allegedly forcing a girl under the age of 13 to perform a sex act and admitted to knowing about alleged sexual acts involving children, dogs and cats that occurred at Hosanna Church.The investigation continues and authorities believe there may be dozens of victims ranging in age from infancy to adolescence. Computers were seized and the crime lab expects to find pictures of sex acts involving children and animals.Nicole Bernard, 36, was charged with aggravated rape of a juvenile under the age of 13
Paul Fontenot, 21, was charged with aggravated rape of a juvenile under the age of 13.
Deputy Christopher Labat, 24, was charged on one count of aggravated rape, one count of crime against nature, and one count of malfeasance in office. Being a law officer, Labat was not put with the general prisoner population. He is, however, on suicide watch.
Louis Lamonica, 45, was charged with two counts of aggravated rape and one count of crime against nature after he confessed that he had sex with children and animals. The entire sex cult case broke wide open when Lamonica walked into the Sheriff's office and confessed. He is the former pastor of the Hosanna Church.
Robbin D. Lamonica, 45, was charged with one count of aggravated rape after a male victim told deputies that he had been having sex with Robbin Lamonica from the time he was 4 years of age until he was 13.
Lois Ann Mowbray, 54, was charged with obstruction of justice, failure to report a felony, and accessory after the fact to aggravated rape.
Allen R. Pierson, 46, was charged with one count of aggravated rape for allegedly engaging in sexual intercourse with a girl who was 9 or 10-years-old at the time. The victim is now 13.
Notably, the laws of Louisiana consider sex with young children a capital crime punishable by death. If the evidence is sufficient, Scott Perrilloux, the 21st Judicial District Attorney, may seek the death penalty. Execution shouldn't be inconceivable. The enormity of the alleged crimes is bewildering.
Companion post at Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
06:59 PM
| Comments (29)
| Add Comment
Post contains 412 words, total size 4 kb.
Grumbling indeed......
Posted by: Rusty at
10:26 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
May 20, 2005
UPDATE--Gin and loquat--better without the loquat.
Posted by: seedubya at
10:52 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 99 words, total size 1 kb.
Ace had a brilliant entry a while back about the concept of keeping "Conservative-Kosher" and how he's kinda half-hearted about it. Part of the reason he drifted right into South-Park conservatism is the incredible number of stupid boycotts leftists frickin' HAVE TO DO OR YOU'RE AN IMPERIALIST PIG. Below the break, his example, plus a long rant of my own:
Posted by: seedubya at
07:43 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 655 words, total size 4 kb.
Obviously, living in a democracy doesn't automatically guarantee freedom of expression.
Companion post at Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
05:31 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 105 words, total size 1 kb.
Atended a speech delivered by the President. Very cool since I had no idea he was going to be the key note speaker.
Met two U.S. Senators, including John McCain. The other Senator was decent enough to chat with my students for awhile.
Hung out with my Congressman for about 30 minutes too long while he blathered on and on with every liberal DNC talking point while claiming to be a 'conservative' Democrat.
Sat in on a Senate committee meeting in which Trent Lott looked incredibly bored.
Watched as John Lewis reminded a group of high school students that he was with Dr. King at the March on Washington for the bajillionth time in his life.
Was in the room as Justice Kennedy read the decision from the bench that states could not ban the import of wine---Thomas and Breyer passed notes the whole time.
Had to sit through the Junior Senator from California blathering on and on about 'extremist Republican judges' from the gallery.
Was overheard on the Hill commenting, upon passing Norm Coleman in the halls, that his wife was hot.
Had two half-smokes, three all beef kosher hot dogs, and four Mt. Dews off street carts.
Told a lobbyist representing the rent-to-own furnishings industry that his business was immoral and predatory. I take it Congressional aids aren't so forward as he stormed off in a huff.
Saw the Nationals beat the Brewers. Several yuppified liberals moved because we were beeing a tad bit too obnoxious. Don't you just love liberals-- always fighting for the 'common man' but can't stand to be near any of them.
Witnessed the head of the Israeli Air Force lay a wreathe at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.
Cried as I found my grandfather's name at the new WWII memorial.
Cried again at the Holocaust Museum.
And again reading the Second Innaguaral enshrined on the walls of the Lincoln memorial.
Noticed that the Human Rights Campaign building is right across the street from the YMCA. How prosaic.
Missed my family desperately.
This town is so shallow. This town is so deep. The history I love, the politics and the people I hate.
I'll see some of you tomorrow about 8 p.m. E-mail me for directions.
Posted by: Rusty at
05:16 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 386 words, total size 2 kb.
It has become the prevalent modus operandi for the left to transfer blame from truely guilty to those of their choosing and the MSM for the most part have been complicit in these efforts. It's been going on for years and it's integral to the rationalization and justification of their agenda. The most long standing example of this is their take on crime and criminals. "We can't blame the poor black teen for gunning down 3 people in the street. We must blame the truely guilty, the evil white capitalist who has forced this child into a life of poverty, frustration and violence. We must not hold him accountable, but, rather society and ultimately ourselves for creating an environment by which we produced such a an individual."
Fast forward to Crappergate. It's not the fault of Newsweek for shoddy reporting, nor of the Muslim clerics who daily whip their followers into a frenzied bloodlust ready to rampage at the slightest provocation. No, it's the Bush administrations fault for going to war in Afghanistan and Iraq thereby enflaming the passions of the Muslim world against us. It's our callous attitude and intolerance toward the religion of peace and our efforts to elevate our interests above those who would choose to kill us that are truely responsible for the these deaths. It's the fault of the Bush administration, society and ultimately ourselves.
What a steaming cowpie. The radical Muslim world has had it out for us before George Bush had the faintest glint in his eye to run for President. It started when we chose to support Israel in the Middle East and has been festering increasingly ever since. The Muslim terrorist's have been bombing our facilities and killing our people across the globe for decades and it has to do with who we are and what we stand for. The only thing that will change their attitude toward us is to change the very core of ourselves as a people.
Maybe that's what the MSM really feels is neccessary. That we as a people discard our current set of morals, values and beliefs in favor of a more "worldly"concoction, one of their choosing. That we subjugate our interests to the interests of the world. That we quit making them mad. After all it's our fault, if we would just quit irritating them, they would leave us alone maybe even learn to love us.
Personally, I'll continue to place the blame where it belongs. This approach may not ultimately result in a worldwide rendition of Kumbaya but, that's OK, I can't sing anyway.
Posted by Traderrob
Posted by: Traderrob at
09:08 AM
| Comments (36)
| Add Comment
Post contains 496 words, total size 3 kb.
What? The Sith? F--- that noise. I'm talkin' about the new Bill Whittle essay: Sanctuary, Part One and Part Two.
A new Whittler should be an event in the rightish Immedia like the arrival of Beaujolais Nouveau in November--a tasty good reason for a party. It's long, though, so if you are reading this from work, do yourself a favor: print it out, and take it home, and Sunday night instead of watching some crap on TV, pour yourself a double bourbon, settle back into a comfy chair, and enjoy it.
Posted by: seedubya at
05:04 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 200 words, total size 1 kb.
There's something about ths piece from the New York Times Op/Ed page that just got me riled up, and I had to tackle it. I don't really have a problem with the basic thesis that terrorism, and even suicide terrorism, is a rational strategy. But I really do not like what Professor Pape does with that, at all.
Blowing Up an Assumption
By ROBERT A. PAPE
Published May 18, 2005
Chicago
MANY Americans are mystified by the recent rise in the number and the audacity of suicide attacks in Iraq.
I'm not. I'm mystified by the absence of reporting about the success of our strategies in Iraq, and the rather obvious fact that we're winning. So is there a reason why I need to read the rest of this? I'll read it though, because I have a hunch there are illusions waiting to be dispelled. Call me psychic. more...
Posted by: Demosophist at
02:30 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 3259 words, total size 21 kb.
May 19, 2005
I mean, I love you kids and all, but we do have our priorities... ;-)
Posted by: Suzanne at
05:43 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
Historical perspective:
The filibuster has been used historically by the minority party, which can't win with a vote count. Democrats have opposed the filibuster before — in the 1960s, they accused Republicans of using it to block civil rights legislation.
According to the Senate Historical Office, the record for the longest individual speech is held by the late Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, who filibustered for 24 hours and 18 minutes against the Civil Rights Act of 1957. To keep the floor, he read some of his wife's recipes and passages from novels out loud.
Not historical perspective, historical revisionism. In 1957 Strom Thurmond was a Democrat. Robert Byrd was at the forefront in pushing for the defeat of the Civil Rights act.
The Republicans joined with northern and western democrats to overcome the attempt of Southern Democrats to defeat this legislation through use of the filibuster . Some notable Democrats spearheading this effort: Al Gore Sr, William Fulbright, Robert Byrd and Strom Thurmond. It was Minority Leader Everett Dirksen, who had enlisted the Republican votes that made cloture a realistic option.....
Don't be misled by the MSM. It WAS NOT the Republicans who invoked the filibuster to stymie civil rights, it was a regional fight with for the most part Southern Democrats the driving force behind it's usage.
Posted by Traderrob
Update:Thanks to Gordon at Cranky Neocon we discover that ABC pulled this paragraph....
"Democrats have opposed the filibuster before — in the 1960s, they accused Republicans of using it to block civil rights legislation."
Has it ever crossed their mind to be truthful and accurate the FIRST time.
Posted by: Traderrob at
01:41 PM
| Comments (24)
| Add Comment
Post contains 280 words, total size 2 kb.
By Demosophist, (while Rusty is living it up in Adams-Morgan and forgetting to tell me where to meet him.)
Well, I'm frankly puzzled by this whole Koran-flushing thing. I understand how a people steeped in a vengeful literature for a thousand years might get upset when a few red infidels use laser-guided bombs to blow up their neighborhoods while we're liberating them from tyranny. And I grasp the idea of the shame of a proud people when inferior mongrel troops are sent into a place like Fallujah or Ramadi to uncover baby Auschwitz slaughterhouses with shaky plaintive notes from the victims scrawled on the walls in their own blood, or when we bomb Baghdad in "Shock and Awe" while they stand on their rooftops so as not to miss anything, or when a group of our miscreants discomfit captives guilty of far worse, with the cultural indignities of plebe hazing. I understand that, and it sorta makes sense. But why do they wait until they think we might have flushed a [holy] book down the crapper before instigating an Ummah-wide lethal street uprising? Why now, and not then?
more...
Posted by: Demosophist at
01:33 PM
| Comments (45)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1185 words, total size 8 kb.
King County's absentee-ballot supervisor has testified that she collaborated with her boss when she filled out a report that falsely showed all ballots were accounted for in the November election.
Nicole Way said in a deposition Friday that she and assistant elections superintendent Garth Fell agreed to the misleading report because officials didn't know how many absentee ballots were returned by voters.
The regulations require counties to reconcile the number of absentee ballots returned by voters with the number of ballots accepted or rejected. Way's report showed perfect reconciliation because it simply added the number accepted and rejected to calculate ballots returned.
Elections officials now acknowledge that dozens of absentee ballots were misplaced and the votes not tabulated during the November election. The ballots were never counted as accepted or rejected.
Knowingly falsifying elections records is a felony..... Can you say butt buddy Mr. Fell ?
Posted by Traderrob
Posted by: Traderrob at
08:38 AM
| Comments (39)
| Add Comment
Post contains 175 words, total size 1 kb.
Remember Eason Jordan, the CNN News Director who shot off his mouth at Davos, claiming that US troops were targeting and killing journalists? Yeah, you know the guy, he had absolutely nothing to back that up (of course) and the Immedia began howling for him to release the tape of his remarks to clarify what he said. And the dude resigned rather than give up the tape.
Well, it's happened again. A local TV newsman named Mark Hyman has caught Linda Foley, the International President of the Newspaper Guild, making the same sort of scurrilous charges against our troops that Eason Jordan did. But unlike Jordan or Foley, Mark Hyman has the tape to back it up.
Of course Hyman probably would have just noted this on his local TV station and people would have said "My, that's awful" and that would have been the end of it, but the Immedia has now immortalized the story and is spreading the news right now directly into your brain. The bodacious, the audacious Bryan Preston of Junkyard Blog has the links, the scoop, and the analysis and I see a well-deserved Instalanche in his future. I see a well-deserved act of contrition and an apology to the troops in Ms. Foley's.
Speaking of targeting journalists, Ms. Foley's timing is amazing. Who would have thought the Mainstream Media could put two bullets right through its own foot in such rapid succession?
Posted by: seedubya at
02:38 AM
| Comments (31)
| Add Comment
Post contains 258 words, total size 2 kb.
I am looking forward to his Screed-blog.
UPDATE! Marvin Olasky is On F'n Fire!
The head dude at the (evangelical Christian) World Magazine, has a spot-on column over at Townhall--the syndicated columns are just now working their way through the editing process tonight in the dinosaur media--which is good because it keeps the topic alive after the initial Immedia blitz. Coulter's is worth your time too.
Olasky's column is just a series of devastating rhetorical questions, of which this is my favorite:
-- If Newsweek journalists had been more knowledgeable about the likely reaction, would they still have run the story? The magazine on Oct. 21, 2002, ripped Jerry Falwell's riot-causing depiction of Muhammad as a "terrorist," since "Islamic fundamentalists are having a field day with these comments, which have been played and replayed throughout the Muslim world." Does Newsweek have a similar responsibility not to cry fire in a crowded theater?
Sauce for the goose, Newsweek. Sauce for the goose.
Posted by: seedubya at
01:11 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 181 words, total size 1 kb.
May 18, 2005
Think Newsweek will want to do a story on this one?
While Muslims have responded with deadly outrage to the now-retracted report by Newsweek of alleged Quran desecration by U.S. interrogators, there was little outcry three years ago when Islamic terrorists holed up in Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity reportedly used the Bible as toilet paper.Catholic priests in the church marking the spot where Jesus was believed to have been born said that during the five-week siege, Palestinians tore up some Bibles for toilet paper and removed many valuable sacramental objects, according to a May 15, 2002, report by the Washington Times.
Newsweek is under fire for a report in its May 9 edition that sparked protests and rioting across the Muslim world resulting in 17 dead, scores injured, relief buildings burned down and a setback to years of coalition-building against terrorists.
Posted by: Suzanne at
10:52 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 161 words, total size 1 kb.
136 queries taking 0.2316 seconds, 563 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








